recycled-ni-neutrino

mirror of https://github.com/tuxbox-fork-migrations/recycled-ni-neutrino.git synced 2025-08-31 09:21:09 +02:00

Go to file

Stefan Seyfried f02fec6579 sectionsd: replace existing events with event from lower table ID

If we get a new epg event whose eventID is already existing, still
replace the existing event if the table ID of the new event is lower.
This comes from the observation that the lower table IDs have the
"more current" events:
Table 0x60-0x6f: other TS, scheduled
 0x50-0x5f: current TS, scheduled
 0x4f: other TS, current/next
 0x4e: current TS, current/next
So, at at least in theory, an event from table 0x4e should always be
"better" than one from 0x60.
If you see any regressions, don't hesitate to report them.

git-svn-id: file:///home/bas/coolstream_public_svn/THIRDPARTY/applications/neutrino-experimental@1382 e54a6e83-5905-42d5-8d5c-058d10e6a962


Origin commit data
------------------
Branch: ni/coolstream
Commit: 04bd1ce20b
Author: Stefan Seyfried <seife@tuxbox-git.slipkontur.de>
Date: 2011-04-09 (Sat, 09 Apr 2011)

Origin message was:
------------------
sectionsd: replace existing events with event from lower table ID

If we get a new epg event whose eventID is already existing, still
replace the existing event if the table ID of the new event is lower.
This comes from the observation that the lower table IDs have the
"more current" events:
Table 0x60-0x6f: other TS,  scheduled
   0x50-0x5f: current TS, scheduled
   0x4f:   other TS,  current/next
   0x4e:   current TS, current/next
So, at at least in theory, an event from table 0x4e should always be
"better" than one from 0x60.
If you see any regressions, don't hesitate to report them.

git-svn-id: file:///home/bas/coolstream_public_svn/THIRDPARTY/applications/neutrino-experimental@1382 e54a6e83-5905-42d5-8d5c-058d10e6a962


------------------
This commit was generated by Migit

2011-04-09 16:35:16 +00:00